The End of Tort Reform?: the Constitutional Battle Looms over Mississippi
نویسنده
چکیده
Thirty years ago, rising health care costs sparked a panic in state legislatures. 1 As a result, states began looking for ways to tame increasing health care costs. 2 Many, including insurance companies and health care providers, attributed the rising costs to increased litigation, excessive jury verdicts, and rising insurance premiums. 3 As a result, legislatures turned to statutory caps on noneconomic damage as the preferred method to control these costs. 4 The basic reasoning behind these caps was that increasingly large jury verdicts for pain and suffering and other noneconomic damages ultimately caused insurers to greatly increase the cost of insurance, or alternatively, stop offering coverage altogether due to high costs. 5
منابع مشابه
Medical liability reform: a case study of Mississippi.
Mississippi enacted medical negligence and other tort reform legislation that generally became effective for causes of action filed on or after January 1, 2003, and September 1, 2004. Data regarding lawsuits against physicians insured by the Medical Assurance Company of Mississippi (MACM), the largest medical liability insurer in the state, and MACM-insured Obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) ...
متن کاملThe relationship between tort reform and medical utilization.
INTRODUCTION The hidden cost of defensive medicine has been cited by policymakers as a significant driving force in the increase of our nation's health-care costs. If this hypothesis is correct, one would expect that states with higher levels of tort reform will have a decrease in Medicare utilization and that medical utilization will decrease after tort reform is enacted. METHODS State-level...
متن کاملMalpractice crisis and reform.
Medical liability coverage has become increasingly expensive and scarce since 2001, especially for obstetrics and other high-risk specialties. Physicians, whose own fees are constrained, see this as a crisis needing tort reform to cap payouts. Plaintiffs' lawyers fight caps; they blame insurance trends and call for stronger regulation of insurers and physicians. Doctors' arguments are somewhat ...
متن کاملDiscourse Analysis of the Reformation of Religious Knowledge in the Constitutional Age (Case Study: The Holy Spirit(
The confrontation of Iranian intellectuals with the Western civilization of the constitutional age led to the acceptance of Western ideas by the elites at this historical juncture, which had emerged as traditionalist, modernist discourses and reformed religious knowledge. This article seeks to recognize the characteristics of the Discourse of Religious Knowledge Reform in the Holy Spirit. Criti...
متن کاملFrom PI to IP: Yet Another Unexpected Effect of Tort Reform
Is there a connection between state-law tort reform and the explosive growth of U.S. intellectual property (IP) litigation? The literature has established that the number of tort claims in states with tort reform has gone down. How do personal injury (PI) plaintiff lawyers deal with the decrease in the demand for their services? Could a significant number of them end up shifting their practice ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011